November 26, 2010

AP: Probe leads investors to wonder: Is game rigged?

Below is an AP article regarding insider trading which quotes Ross Intelisano.

Probe leads investors to wonder: Is game rigged?
By RACHEL BECK, BERNARD CONDON and PALLAVI GOGOI, AP Business Writers Rachel Beck, Bernard Condon And Pallavi Gogoi, Ap Business Writers Wed Nov 24, 4:13 pm ET
NEW YORK – The Wall Street insider trading investigation may lead everyday investors — already rattled by a stock market meltdown, a one-day "flash crash" and the Madoff scandal — to finally conclude that the game is rigged.
"A large part of trading has to do with trust, and I don't have it," says Mark Swenson, a 43-year-old plumber from New Hampshire who refuses to buy individual stocks.
"When a stock moves up 10 percent, you don't know why," he added. "We can pretend that everyone has access to the same information, but they don't."
Even before news broke that federal investigators were looking into whether hedge funds traded on inside information, small-time investors were pulling their money out of stocks — despite a remarkable run for the market since the spring of 2009.
Americans have pulled $60 billion out of U.S. stock funds this year, according to the Investment Company Institute, a trade group. Meanwhile, investors have piled money into Treasuries and bond funds that are considered safer investments, even if they don't return as much money. And at the same time, banks like Wells Fargo have reported that money is moving into checking and savings accounts.
To be sure, it's natural for people worried about their jobs or the falling value of their homes to sock cash into more conservative investments. But this has been no garden-variety recession.
It has coincided with turmoil in the stock market that goes back a decade, to the collapse of the Internet bubble and portfolio-draining scandals involving high-flying companies such as Enron and WorldCom.
More recently, investors have lived through the housing bubble, the collapse of Wall Street firms such as Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers and stomach-churning days when it wasn't clear whether capitalism would survive. On top of that came news that financier Bernard Madoff had bilked investors out of billions.
"Virtually everyone on the Street believes there are significant improprieties, and I think there is an even more important point for the massive number of investors who are not Wall Street players," says former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, once known as the "sheriff of Wall Street" for aggressively prosecuting white-collar crime as state attorney general. "And that is for most of us, you can't beat these guys at their own game."
People are nervous about the state of their assets in part because their homes are worth so much less these days, not to mention job insecurity and slow economic growth overall.
Some pros on Wall Street say hesitation by small investors is good news. It means that there's plenty of "dry powder" to propel the market higher in the next few months when and if the little guy finally relents and joins in the rally.
The insider-trading probe could test that theory.
The FBI this week searched the offices of three hedge funds, and some of Wall Street's most influential firms, including Janus Capital Group, have been subpoenaed in the probe.
On Wednesday, an employee of a firm that supplied market intelligence to hedge funds was arrested and charged, among other things, with conspiracy to commit securities fraud. It was not yet known whether the man dealt with the funds raided this week.
For Swenson, the allegations of insider trading are unnerving, particularly on top of the "flash crash" in May, when a computerized selling program set off a chain reaction that drove the Dow Jones industrials down nearly 1,000 points in mere minutes.
The sell-off was a reminder to some individual investors that hedge funds and other powerful traders use computer programs to make rapid-fire stock trades, giving them an advantage over the slower smaller investor.
"The hedge funds are resorting to more questionable tactics. It's mind-boggling," says Swenson, who invests largely in exchange-traded funds, which track market indexes and can be traded throughout the day, unlike mutual funds.
Spitzer says the new insider trading probes illustrate how the game is tilted against small investors.
"If you are sitting there in front of a screen, thinking your information is going to be good enough to make smart judgments that will permit you to outperform the hundreds of thousands of people on Wall Street who have access to better information and more timely information than you, you're mistaken," Spitzer says.
It's not the first time small investors have been scared out of stocks.
Charles Geisst, a finance professor at Manhattan College who has written 18 books on the history of markets, says investors balked at buying for years after the Crash of 1929 and Black Monday in 1987. The view both times: The odds are stacked against the little guy.
To combat such an impression, the Securities and Exchange Commission was established in 1934, and "circuit breakers" were instituted after the 1987 crash to stop massive selling. But all of the safeguards don't seem to be helping lately.
"If the stock markets had any reputation for integrity, they lost it in the past year," Geisst says.
Restoring small investors' confidence may depend on whether they see ample evidence that federal regulators are successfully cracking down on bad behavior, says Ross B. Intelisano, a securities fraud attorney with the firm Rich & Intelisano.
The market needs them back. Most of the stock in U.S. companies, both public and private, is held by individuals, not institutions, according to Federal Reserve data.
Small investors may be comforted to know that professional investors don't always fare better, even with the edge they have over the masses.
Numerous studies have shown that mutual funds overseen by professional stock pickers often are outperformed by computer-driven index funds.
The record for hedge funds hasn't been so impressive, either. Since 2008, when the number of those funds hit 10,000, nearly 3,000 have gone out of business, according to Hedge Fund Research in Chicago.
"The edge is hugely exaggerated," says Richard Ferri, founder of the investment advisory firm Portfolio Solutions and an advocate of low-cost index funds. "If the small investor does the right thing, he can do better than 99 percent of anyone else."
___
Associated Press writer Michael Gormley contributed to this report from Albany, N.Y.

November 9, 2010

The American Lawyer: Judge Rakoff Confirms $20.6 Million Arbitration Award Against Goldman Sachs

Below is a piece by the American Lawyer. Top Story of the day.

TOP STORY November 9, 2010

The Am Law Litigation Daily - Did Goldman Make Bad Gamble With Arbitration Award?

Arbitration / Commercial
Judge Rakoff Confirms $20.6 Million Arbitration Award Against Goldman Sachs
Goldman Sachs isn't known for tactical blunders. Did the banking giant miscalculate by challenging a $20.6 million arbitration award?

That's the question we were left pondering after Manhattan federal district court judge Jed Rakoff confirmed the award, which had been issued by a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority panel in June. (Judge Rakoff's one-page order is here; the judge will issue a more detailed opinion later.) The award was won by the creditors' committee of the Bayou Group, which collapsed in 2005 under the cloud of a $400 million Ponzi scheme orchestrated by its former CEO, Samuel Israel III. In their arbitration claim, Bayou's creditors argued that Goldman, which cleared trades for Bayou, failed to investigate these trades after it learned of potential fraud. Goldman responded that it had no obligation as a prime or clearing broker to detect or report fraud.

The FINRA panel's decision in June got lots of folks on Wall Street gnashing their teeth. The clearing business moves a lot of money and generates plenty of profits for firms like Goldman, and brokers worried that the Bayou award could force them into a policing role and compel them to raise due diligence standards.

Goldman and its lawyers at Shulte, Roth & Zabel filed a lawsuit to vacate the FINRA award in July, arguing that the FINRA panel exceeded its powers "in manifest disregard of the law." The bank got amicus support from the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, which asserted that requiring clearing firms to monitor every trade for potential fraud would cripple securities markets. Sidley Austin's Henry Minerop, who authored SIFMA's brief, declined to comment pending an elaborated opinion from Judge Rakoff.

The Bayou creditors' committee, represented by Rich & Intelisano, argued at a September hearing before Judge Rakoff that the FINRA decision was limited to cases in which clearing firms had been notified of a Ponzi-style fraud.

Goldman will hardly miss $20 million. The problem is that while the FINRA decision may have rankled clearing firms, it was not precedential. Depending on the reasoning in Judge Rakoff's more detailed ruling, other clearing firms may wish that Goldman had chosen to write the Bayou creditors a $20.6 million check.

"We've been fighting for a long period of time, and we look forward to the investors getting some of their money back," Ross Intelisano told us. Goldman’s lead lawyer, Shulte Roth’s Howard Schiffman, referred us to his client, which declined to comment.

-- David Bario

November 9, 2010

Reuters: Goldman loses bid to toss record Bayou award

Here is a piece from Reuters on the Firm's recent win against Goldman Sachs.

Goldman loses bid to toss record Bayou award
3:46am EST

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge on Monday rejected Goldman Sachs Group Inc's bid to throw out a record $20.6 million (12.8 million pounds) arbitration award involving the now-defunct Bayou hedge fund.

U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff in Manhattan granted a request by unsecured creditors of Bayou Group LLC to confirm the award, which was made in June by an arbitration panel of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

Creditors had accused a Goldman (GS.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) unit that cleared trades for Bayou of ignoring signs of fraud at the Connecticut hedge fund.

Bayou was run by Samuel Israel, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence after pleading guilty in 2005 to defrauding investors out of roughly $450 million.

"It's significant," said Ross Intelisano, a partner at Rich & Intelisano LLP, representing the creditors. "It confirms the largest arbitration award ever rendered against Goldman, and provides a significant recovery for investors."

Goldman spokesman Ed Canaday declined to comment. It was not immediately clear whether Goldman plans an appeal.

Rakoff said he will issue a opinion to explain his reasons for upholding the award.

If the award stands, it could increase the requirements that Wall Street banks set before clearing trades for clients.

In court papers, Goldman called the legal foundation for the arbitration award "demonstrably wrong."

Goldman said the law is "crystal clear" that it cannot be liable for money that Bayou deposited into and shuffled among accounts at the bank.

The case is Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing LP v. Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee of Bayou Group LLC, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 10-05622.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel. Editing by Robert MacMillan)

November 8, 2010

NY Times: Judge Upholds Award Against Goldman

Below is a piece from the NY Times' DealBook about Judge Rakoff confirming the $20.6 million arbitration award against Goldman Sachs, the largest arbitration award ever rendered against the firm.

DealBook - A Financial News Service of The New York Times
November 8, 2010, 11:29 am
Judge Upholds Award Against Goldman

A federal judge has denied a request by Goldman Sachs to throw out a record arbitration award levied against the Wall Street firm earlier this year.

Goldman was ordered in June to pay $20.6 million to the unsecured creditors of the Bayou Group, a hedge fund manager, who accused Goldman of ignoring signs of fraud at the firm.

Bayou collapsed in 2005, and the firm’s former chief executive, Samuel Israel III, is serving 20 years for fraud. He pleaded guilty to misrepresenting the value of Bayou’s funds and defrauding clients of more than $400 million.

Goldman cleared trades for Bayou, which was based in Connecticut, before it collapsed. In 2008, Bayou’s unsecured creditors’ committee filed an arbitration claim against Goldman.

Judge Jed S. Rakoff of United States District Court in Lower Manhattan issued an order on Monday, saying a petition by Goldman to vacate the award had been denied.

“After full consideration of the parties’ briefs and oral argument, the court hereby denies the petition to vacate the arbitration award and grants the cross-petition to confirm the award,” he wrote. “However final judgment will not be entered in this case until the court issues an opinion setting forth the reasons for this ruling.”

In July, Goldman moved to vacate the award. During the arbitration, Goldman denied accusations that it had ignored signs of wrongdoing, and it still has more avenues to appeal the award.

A Goldman spokesman declined to comment on Judge Rakoff’s order.

The award was a watershed. If ultimately upheld, it could have ramifications throughout the financial sector. Wall Street firms, which handle billions of dollars in trades, say that their job is to clear the trade, not police the clients. This award could raise the standard for clearing.

“We are looking forward to investors finally getting some of their money back from this tragic fraud,” said Ross Intelisano, a partner at the New York law firm Rich & Intelisano who represented the Bayou creditors.

– Susanne Craig