June 22, 2011

SEC & FINRA Order RMK to Pay $200M for Bond Funds

Below is FINRA's press release of the $200M restitution order the SEC and FINRA levied on Regions Morgan Keegan (RMK) related to bond funds it misrepresented to investors. Big for investors. We had blogged about this in April 2010 when the SEC charged Morgan Keegan & Company, Morgan Asset Management and two employees with fraudulently overstating the value of securities backed by subprime mortgages. These were the first federal government allegations related to the Regions Morgan Keegan bond funds which lost significant value in 2008. Many law firms around the U.S., including our firm, have been retained by investors who lost money in the Regions Morgan Keegan funds. Big fight will be to get fines into evidence during the pending arbitrations.

Morgan Keegan Ordered to Pay $200 Million to Investors to Settle Allegations Regarding Sales of Bond Funds
Sales Materials Made Exaggerated Claims and Failed to Disclose Risks; Supervisory System Failures

WASHINGTON — The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and five state regulators from Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina and Tennessee announced today that each has settled enforcement proceedings against Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. Morgan Keegan will pay restitution of $200 million for customers who invested in seven affiliated bond funds, including the Regions Morgan Keegan Select Intermediate Bond Fund (Intermediate Fund). Morgan Keegan's affiliate, Morgan Asset Management, managed the funds.

FINRA found that from the beginning of Jan. 2006 to the end of Sept. 2007, Morgan Keegan marketed and sold the Intermediate Fund to investors using sales materials that contained exaggerated claims, failed to provide a sound basis for evaluating the facts regarding the fund, were not fair and balanced, and did not adequately disclose the impact of market conditions in 2007 that caused substantial losses to the value of the Intermediate Fund.

The Intermediate Fund invested predominantly in structured products, including mezzanine and subordinated tranches of structured securities including sub-prime products. Morgan Keegan marketed the Intermediate Fund as a relatively safe, investment-grade fixed income mutual fund investment when, in fact, the fund was exposed to risks associated with its investments in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, and subordinated tranches of structured products. By the beginning of 2007, Morgan Keegan was aware that the Intermediate Fund was experiencing difficulties related to the holdings in the fund impacted by turmoil in the mortgage-backed securities market yet failed to adequately disclose those risks in the sales materials or internal guidance. In March 2007, when adverse market conditions began to affect the fund, over 54 percent of the portfolio was invested in asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, and 13.5 percent was invested in subprime products.

Brad Bennett, FINRA Executive Vice President and Chief of Enforcement, said, "FINRA acknowledges the efforts of the Securities and Exchange Commission and state securities regulators in resolving this matter against Morgan Keegan and providing restitution to harmed investors. Firms must ensure that their marketing materials fully and accurately describe the products they sell, including the attendant risks and any relevant information about market conditions that may impact those products. By not fully disclosing the risks, Morgan Keegan portrayed the Intermediate Fund as a safer investment than it was."

FINRA's settlement includes findings that Morgan Keegan failed to establish, maintain and enforce an adequate supervisory system, including written supervisory procedures reasonably designed to achieve compliance with NASD rules. Morgan Keegan's supervisory system and written procedures were not reasonably designed to ensure that its sales literature disclosed certain information as to risk and did not contain exaggerated claims. As a result, Morgan Keegan failed to adequately describe the nature, holdings and certain risks of the Intermediate Fund. In addition, beginning in 2007 when the particular risks associated with the Intermediate Fund's holdings began to impact negatively the holdings in the fund, Morgan Keegan failed to take steps reasonably designed to revise its advertising materials to inform customers of the specific risks of investing in the fund under the current market conditions.

This investigation was conducted by Gino Ercolino, David Fenimore, Gregory Firehock, Theresa Ridder and Richard Santiago of the Enforcement Department, with the assistance of FINRA's Advertising Regulation Department.

Investors can obtain more information about, and the disciplinary record of, any FINRA-registered broker or brokerage firm by using FINRA's BrokerCheck. FINRA makes BrokerCheck available at no charge. In 2010, members of the public used this service to conduct 17.2 million reviews of broker or firm records. Investors can access BrokerCheck at www.finra.org/brokercheck or by calling (800) 289-9999. Investors may find copies of this complaint, as well as other disciplinary documents, in FINRA's Disciplinary Actions Online database.

May 16, 2011

Reuters Quote by Ross Intelisano on Securities Fraud

Below is an interesting Reuters piece by Matt Goldstein which quotes Ross Intelisano regarding securities fraud and Ponzi schemes.

Special Report: A fame-seeking Philly trader's rap falls flat
Photo
Thu, May 12 2011

By Matthew Goldstein

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Tyrone L. Gilliams Jr., a commodities trader, part-time online preacher and hip hop event promoter, is not one for understatement.

In a promotional video for a celebrity-studded charity event last December -- among the headliners was rapper Sean "Diddy" Combs -- Gilliams mugs for the camera. Posing with stacks of money on his lap, he bills himself as a mogul, a philanthropist and a self-starter.

But now one of his investors is crying foul, suing the Camden, New Jersey, native and Ivy League graduate for fraud.

David Parlin, a businessman from Cincinnati, Ohio, claims Gilliams misappropriated much of his private foundation's $4 million investment and used the money to pay for trips to the Bahamas, outings at Miami nightclubs and shopping sprees at Saks Fifth Avenue and a Cherry Hill, New Jersey Mercedes Benz dealership.

On its face, the investment venture that Parlin sunk some of his foundation's money into seems dubious. He was promised, according to court papers, a five percent a week return -- the kind of performance that would make even Ponzi king Bernard Madoff blush. And it was an investment strategy using U.S. Treasuries, where the current yield on a 10-year T-bill is 3.2 percent.

Worse, Parlin says he didn't even know the money had been passed on to Gilliams to manage until shortly before he filed the lawsuit. He's also suing New York financier Vassilis Morfopoulos, who transferred the foundation's money to Gilliams.

SCAMS GALORE

It appears Parlin's due diligence was not complete.

But some securities experts are not surprised. Nearly two-and-a-half years after Madoff's decades long investment fraud came to light and prosecutors charged Allen Stanford with running a $7 billion Ponzi scheme, there has hardly been a pause in the number of new dubious investment schemes. Unfortunately, yield-hungry investors have been slow to grasp that if an investment opportunity sounds too good to be true -- it probably is.

Last year, for instance, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought 47 enforcement actions against the architects of apparent Ponzi schemes. That's just seven fewer than securities regulators filed in 2009. And tips about new investment schemes keep coming to the SEC on a regular basis.

"Every day we see tips alleging Ponzi schemes," says Thomas Sporkin, who oversees the SEC's new market intelligence unit, which is responsible for vetting and filtering the more than 30,000 tips securities regulators get each year from the public. "Unfortunately, investment schemes appear just as prevalent as ever."

Tuesday, SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro, in testimony on Capitol Hill, told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that "fraudulent investment schemes disguised as investment opportunities" accounted for 22 percent of the agency's enforcement actions in 2010.

Indeed, securities experts say each year individual investors -- even sophisticated ones who should seemingly know better -- lose hundreds of millions of dollars to financial charlatans. But many under-the-radar scams tend to get overlooked by regulators and short-shrift from the financial media because the dollars involved are relatively small and the alleged scamsters don't work for big Wall Street banks like Goldman Sachs Group or JP Morgan Chase.

"You hear more about the bank cases because there is often a big pot of money at the end of the day," said Ross Intelisano, a New York securities attorney with Rich & Intelisano. "But I get called on these small scams all the time. But sometimes they are even too small for us to get involved."

It's too soon to say how the Parlin case will play out. Parlin, who made his fortune from founding a Midwestern-based company that refurbished automated teller machines company called The ATM Exchange, has had at least one discussion about his 2010 investment with agents in the Cincinnati office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, according to a court filing.

SUPPORTING PLAYERS

For his part, Gilliams, who did not respond to repeated requests by Reuters for comment and does not appear to have retained a lawyer, is keeping an uncharacteristic low profile. Earlier this year, he suddenly abandoned a small office he had in downtown Philadelphia, skipping out on the rent, according to court records.

The official headquarters for his TL Gilliams LLC trading firm, which claims to have offices in two dozen locations around the globe, is a so-called virtual office located in a building in a Philadelphia suburb. Mail is collected for Gilliams at the location and a receptionist takes phone messages. But a person familiar with the facility says the trader rarely shows up in person.

Beyond Gilliams, the litigation and interviews by Reuters also reveals an array of middleman and unregistered investment advisers, each of whom may have played a part in the investment venture. For instance, Morfopoulos, the New York financier who invested Parlin's money with Gilliams, has his own questionable track record. In 2005, he was sued by the federal government for failing to pay nearly a quarter of a million dollars in back taxes.

Christopher Chang, the lawyer for Morfopoulos, says his client was duped just like Parlin and "denies any participation in the fraud perpetrated by Tyrone Gilliams." Chang adds that his client intends to fully cooperate with Parlin in helping him get his money back.

Laura Keller, a San Francisco financial consultant, said she recommended Gilliams to Morfopoulos and another Bay Area investor group based on a recommendation she'd got from Blackhawk Wealth Solutions, a San Diego-based investment advisory firm. Phone calls and emails to Blackhawk executives weren't returned.

Says Keller: "Proper questioning and trust and prior working experience and their vetting made the referral strong."

Other middlemen who may have been involved in the deal, according to court records and interviews, were Brett Smith, also named as a defendant in the lawsuit, and Santiago Delgado of Global Fortress Inc. based in West Palm Beach, Fla.

LIGHTS. CAMERAS. ACTION

Some of the allegations of profligate spending outlined in Parlin's lawsuit filed in Manhattan federal court would seem to dovetail with images of Gilliams' over-the-top lifestyle, which were captured last year in a series of videos he had posted online under the banner "TLG TV." (vimeo.com/19156957)

Gilliams, who graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in 1990 and was a standout basketball player for the Ivy League school's team, hired a team of professional videographers to follow him around. He appears to have been trying to position himself as some sort of high-living Internet reality TV star who made a fortune trading oil, gold, diamonds and sugar.

His TLG TV was something like an online version of "Keeping up with the Kardashians," the reality TV show about a celebrity family that parties hard for the cameras, crossed with "Trading Places," the 1983 hit movie about Philadelphia commodities traders starring Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd. In one online video, Gilliams brags that he will get Kim Kardashian, the reality show's star, to walk the red carpet at the charity gala held at Philadelphia's Ritz-Carlton Hotel. (vimeo.com/17522005)

Kardashian was a no-show at Gilliams' "Joy to the World Fest" event. Aside from Combs, other celebrities who did turn out included actor Lance Gross and Sheree Whitfield, from "The Real Housewives of Atlanta," another reality TV show. Also attending the gala were local politicians such as Pennsylvania State Senator Anthony Williams and Chaka Fattah, a Democratic congressman from Philadelphia. Tickets for the events sold for between $250 and $1,200.

But in the wake of Parlin's lawsuit a number of people who worked with Gilliams in arranging the event are distancing themselves from the trader. Privately some now say they question just how much money was raised for charity from the gala and how Gilliams got the start-up money to organize the event.

These people say Gilliams often arrived at a nightclub surrounded by a bevy of armed security guards, or showed up at some luxury car dealer and put down a deposit on an Aston Martin.

"I saw a lot of money going out but not much money coming in," said Tim Fontaine, a videographer and producer with The Artist Warehouse in Chester, Pennsylvania, who was hired by Gilliams to produce the "TLG TV" online videos. "I have footage where I see him blow $70,000 on drinks. The idea was to party with the rich and famous ... and to see the world through Gilliams' eyes."

A representative for Combs declined to comment. But the weekend of the event, Combs also was in Philadelphia for the grand opening of a new nightclub called Vault. More than two decades ago, Gilliams and Combs were part of a group of investors in a failed venture to represent professional athletes called Bad Boys Sportz. But the men are not reported to be close friends.

There are just as many unanswered questions surrounding Gilliams' commodities trading business.

The website for his firm, TL Gilliams LLC, (tlgilliams.com/) says the trader works with a "team" to analyze deals but offers few details. Neither Gilliams nor his firm are registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or the National Futures Association. On the website, Gilliams says he expects to become an owner of a "major refinery in Brazil."

MINING DISASTER

The litigation involving Parlin is not the first time Gilliams' trading business has sparked controversy.

A year ago, Gilliams teamed up with a group of investors that tried to acquire $10 million in assets from a bankrupt coal mining operation in Utah. But the deal was scuttled when "T.L. Gilliams surreptitiously withdrew $10 million that had been deposited in the bank account" of the company the parties formed to buy the mining assets, according to court papers filed by lawyers for Kenneth Rushton, the trustee in the U.S. bankruptcy case for C.W. Mining Company.

In advance of the sale, the $10 million had apparently been deposited in the bank account by Gilliams' firm, though it is not clear exactly whose money it was. The court record is not clear on why the money was withdrawn or what happened to it.

A few weeks before the sale was scheduled to take place, a U.S. bankruptcy judge held a hearing to determine whether Gilliams' group had the financing to complete the transaction. During that proceeding, Joseph Giordano, who at the time was a principal with Fieldstone, a small New York investment firm, testified that he and Gilliams had worked together for "multiple years" on various transactions. Giordano also told the court he and Gilliams "co-manage" a trading account that "has approximately $400 million in it."

It's not clear, however, if such an account even exists.

Giordano, who no longer works for Fieldstone, could not be reached for comment. The only registered fund that Giordano is listed as having managed is the Fieldstone Value Partners Fund, which as of four years ago had raised less than $1 million.

Parlin's lawsuit claims that Gilliams transferred $450,000 of his $4 million to a bank account held in the name of Fieldstone Value Partners Fund. Parlin says the money transfer "appears to have been part of a Ponzi scheme orchestrated by Gilliams."

Officials with Fieldstone did not respond to a request for comment.

Neither Parlin nor his lawyer Louis Craco will comment on the litigation. But court papers reveal that in January, Parlin began demanding that Morfopoulos return his $4 million because the Cincinnati businessman had not received any of the promised returns on his investment. It wasn't until mid-March that Parlin says he ultimately learned that Morfopoulos had inked a deal behind his back with Gilliams to manage the money.

On April 13, Parlin filed suit in Manhattan federal court against Gilliams and Morfopoulos, claiming they had defrauded him and that Gilliams misappropriated his money.

As it happened, just a few weeks before Parlin learned of Gilliams involvement, the Philadelphia trader was planning to raise money for new investment vehicle. On February 28, Gilliams filed a registration statement with the SEC for the "Black Fox Fund" -- a planned $20 million stock-focused fund.

(Reporting by Matthew Goldstein; Editing by Jim Impoco and Claudia Parsons)

February 7, 2011

Rich & Intelisano Wins Punitive Damages Award

Rich & Intelisano recently won a FINRA arbitration award which included $100,000 in punitive damages. The case is Stora, et al. v. Strasbourger, Pearson et al. (FINRA 09-01769). We represented a group of investors who were defrauded by a broker dealer and its registered representatives. Matthew Woodruff of our office tried the matter which included five hearing sessions. The panel awarded the claimants $373,968 in compensatory damages, plus interest. The award is significant because pursuant to the Mastrobuono Supreme Court decision, the panel awarded claimants $100,000 in punitive damages, a rarity in securities arbitrations.

October 4, 2010

Ross Intelisano Named to 2010 New York Super Lawyers List

New York Super Lawyers, a publication of The New York Times Magazine, has named Ross B. Intelisano as one of New York’s top Securities Litigation attorneys in their 2010 publication. The list of Super Lawyers recognizes lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement in their respective fields. Super Lawyers' selection process is a vigorous multi-phase rating process based on peer nominations and evaluations, combined with third-party research. Their selection process has been recognized by bar associations and courts across the country.

Ross Intelisano is the only attorney on the 2010 New York Super Lawyers top Securities Litigation list who primarily represents institutional and individual investors in securities arbitration.

July 9, 2010

Brooklyn Law School Mag Features Ross Intelisano

Below is a profile of Ross Intelisano from the Spring 2010 edition of the Brooklyn Law School Magazine BLSLaw Notes.

BLSLawNotes
The Magazine of Brooklyn Law School | Spring 2010
Alumni Update
Ross Intelisano ’94: Fighting Fraud from Bear Stearns to Bernie Madoff and Beyond


In 2006, Ross Intelisano made a prediction. A seasoned securities arbitration lawyer with a reputation as one of the leading authorities on securities fraud and Ponzi schemes, Intelisano looked into the future and saw a financial crisis of unimaginable proportion. He put his vision on paper and published an article in Bloomberg Law Reports entitled “Hedge Fund Fraud — The Future of Securities Arbitration?” in which he predicted, one year prior to the Bear Stearns High Grade Funds implosion, that broker-dealers would roll out proprietary hedge funds that were bound to unleash havoc on the financial system. Unfortunately for the market, and for the countless number of investors hurt by Bear Stearns, Intelisano was right.

In 2007, as predicted, Bear Stearns’ High Grade hedge funds crashed, with $1.6 billion in losses. Intelisano was there to pick up the pieces, taking on Bear Stearns on behalf of Racetrac, a multi-billion dollar private company that had lost $5 million in Stearns’ High Grade Structured Credit Strategies Hedge Fund. In December 2009, after a 16-day arbitration in Atlanta, Intelisano won a $3.4 million arbitration award on their behalf. The award was groundbreaking for two reasons: It was the first verdict in any forum relating to the High Grade Funds, and it was rendered after portfolio managers Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin were acquitted in a federal criminal trial.

While the Racetrac arbitration was an historic case, it was not the first time Intelisano had been on the pioneering end of an arbitration. He has long been a crusader for defrauded investors.

After graduating from the Law School in 1994, Intelisano joined Pressman & Associates, a one-man shop where he began to practice securities and employment law. Three years later, he was recruited by Eppenstein & Eppenstein, a premier securities arbitration firm, where he served as co-trial counsel on Engel et. al. v. Refco, the legendary commodities fraud case. The 100-day arbitration, on behalf of 13 individuals and family-run businesses, generated a $43 million judgment in 2001. It remains the largest collected arbitration award ever rendered on behalf of retail investors against a brokerage firm.

In 2003, he joined forces with Eppenstein colleague John G. Rich to form Rich & Intelisano where he continued to try landmark cases, most notably working on behalf of investors who lost over $25 million in the $300 million Bayou hedge fund Ponzi scheme run by convicted fraudster Sam Israel. In Bayou, Intelisano once again did the unprecedented, filing a group arbitration case not against Israel, but against the registered investment advisor who had recommended Bayou to investors, for failure to perform adequate due diligence. The case, which was settled in mediation, was the first time in the world of secu¬rities arbitration that anyone had implicated an investment advisor in a Ponzi scheme.

And then came Bernie Madoff and a Ponzi scheme so large that it dwarfed anything the securities world had ever seen ($18 billion is the latest estimate). Intelisano’s phone started ringing. “I spent hours consoling investors, listening to all of these tragic stories of middle class people who had lost every dime they had saved over a lifetime,” he recalled. “I knew they would never get it back. It was the lowest point of my career as a lawyer.”

While he knew he would not be able to help investors sue Madoff (their restitution is being handled by a court-appointed trustee), he brought back the “investment advisor theory” he advanced in Bayou, and is currently representing a group of 12 victims in claims against investment advisors to Madoff feeder funds. The hearings begin in June.

With the Madoff cases ahead of him, and the victories in Racetrac and Bayou behind him, Intelisano has become one of the country’s most well respected experts in the world of hedge fund fraud. He has appeared on The Today Show, Anderson Cooper 360, Dateline NBC, PBS’s Frontline, Closing Bell with Maria Bartiromo, and is regularly quoted in The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.

Looking into the future, Intelisano believes the horizon remains clouded over with the potential for serious fraud. “Over-the-counter derivatives, credit default swaps, oil futures, all of these products that the government is worried about regulating are very complex and are improperly being sold to retail and institutional investors. Firms aren’t watching the shop. No one is.”

Prediction noted.

62 • BLSLawNotes

January 12, 2010

Sean Coffey for New York Attorney General

Sean Coffey has recently embarked on a campaign to become the next Attorney General of New York State. I have never been substantially involved in a political campaign before, but Sean is different. I’ve worked with and known Sean and his prior law firm for many years and I have never been more impressed with a potential candidate for elected office as I am with Sean. He is smart, loyal, strong and possesses all of the qualities needed to be a fantastic Attorney General. Therefore, I’m going to be actively involved in helping Sean become the next Attorney General. And I think he’s going to win. The press is certainly catching on very quickly. Kate Kelley, a very well respected writer for the Wall Street Journal, wrote a great piece about the AG race. Here is the link. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704561004575013503448906246.html

And a snippet from the piece:

“So far, Wall Street isn't taking much heat from current or potential candidates to succeed Mr. Cuomo.

Mr. Coffey, a former Navy pilot who won $6 billion for investors in the failed telecommunications company WorldCom Inc., was described in a magazine article that followed his victory as "Wall Street's New Nemesis." He said in an interview that his reputation "is not going to be an albatross around my neck in this election."

Noting the securities industry's importance to the economy of New York, he said his aim as attorney general would be to root out corrupt individuals. "I think Wall Street works great when it plays by the rules," said Mr. Coffey, 53.”

Sean has been committed to a lifetime of public service. His resume is truly spectacular. Here are some highlights. He graduated from Annapolis with merit in 1978. On active duty during the Cold War, Sean flew as a P-3 Orion mission commander tracking Soviet nuclear submarines.
After completing his first squadron tour, Sean was selected for important shore assignments in Washington, D.C. as Junior Officer Intern to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the personal military assistant to then-Vice President George H.W. Bush. While stationed in Washington, Sean attended Georgetown University Law Center at night, winning several academic awards, serving as the sole evening-division editor of the Georgetown Law Journal and graduating magna cum laude.

In 1987, after resigning from active Navy service, Sean returned to New York as a litigation associate with the law firm of Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison. Sean was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York in 1991. He worked with federal, state and local law enforcement agencies prosecuting a wide variety of cases involving firearms, narcotics, business crime, bank fraud, and other major crimes. Sean tried many cases to verdict.

In 1995, Sean joined the law firm of Latham & Watkins where, as counsel and later partner, he defended Fortune 500 companies in many complex civil, regulatory, and criminal matters. After several years as a corporate defense attorney, Sean decided to return to pursuing corporate misconduct and joined the litigation firm of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, which represents many of the world’s largest institutional investors, including New York State’s Common Retirement Fund and Teachers’ Retirement System and many Taft-Hartley union funds.

In his eleven years at Bernstein Litowitz, Sean led teams that recovered billions of dollars for victims of corporate fraud and malfeasance and won praise for achieving significant corporate governance improvements. Among Sean’s notable successes was his role in the WorldCom securities litigation, a case he took to trial in 2005 as lead attorney for thousands of investors, including the New York State Common Retirement Fund. Sean and his team recovered over $6 billion and -- in a historic first -- required all outside directors and key wrongdoers to contribute from their personal funds. Sean was selected as one of the National Law Journal’s “Winning Attorneys” of 2005, and profiled by Bloomberg Markets magazine (“Wall Street’s New Nemesis”), the American Lawyer (“Taking Citi to School” and “Breaking the Banks”), and The Wall Street Journal (“It’s Coffey Time”). Sean recently retired from Bernstein Litowitz to seek the Democratic nomination to become New York’s next Attorney General.

To me, the office of the Attorney General is one of the most important positions in our state’s government and, in more recent months, our country. As we face difficult times, I am confident Sean is the person who can best serve as the people’s lawyer and advocate. This is Sean’s first run for elected office and, with that, he brings a diverse and successful legal career as a prosecutor, defense attorney and plaintiff’s lawyer. He is an honest, loyal, professional man who will bring a great deal of integrity to the office.


November 18, 2009

FINRA Will Permanently Disclose Disciplinary Actions Against Former Brokers on BrokerCheck

FINRA announced yesterday that it won approval from the SEC to expand its BrokerCheck service to make records of final regulatory actions against brokers permanently available to the public, regardless of whether the broker continues to be employed in the securities industry.

The FINRA press release states disclosure records for former brokers will be available on BrokerCheck beginning November 30. It goes on to state, “This is an important step for investors and for investor protection," said FINRA Chairman and CEO Richard Ketchum. "Individuals previously barred by FINRA and other regulators have surfaced in a number of recent frauds in other parts of the financial industry that cost unsuspecting investors millions of dollars. It has never been more critical for investors to research the backgrounds of the financial professionals they deal with than it is today."

This is an important addition to the publicly available regulatory records of former brokers. Often times, permanently barred brokers, traders and salesmen will attempt to work at unregistered entities such as hedge funds. It is difficult for potential investors to do due diligence on a hedge fund manager without the historical BrokerCheck information. In the past, if a registered representative was out of the business for more than two years, a public investor had no access to the broker’s disciplinary record.

BrokerCheck is available at www.finra.org/brokercheck